- Ptlens samyang 14mm profile manual#
- Ptlens samyang 14mm profile upgrade#
- Ptlens samyang 14mm profile full#
Ptlens samyang 14mm profile manual#
Being a manual focus only lens might seem like a limitation, but at 14mm, hyperfocal distance is your friend.ĭon’t trust the online hyperfocal calculators, they are all overly generous with determining the depth of field. It was a fully manual, nothing automatic, nothing electronic, no communications with the camera body, just glass metal and plastic kind of lens. It was a prime lens, and it wasn’t able to accept filters, and it wasn’t weather sealed, so I was losing a lot of versatility that the Nikon 16-35 f/4 would have given me, but it was sharper and wider for a third the price, and sharp and wide and cheap is exactly what I was after. The only question left was “How much?” $429.99 CAD? Damn. It was crisp from centre to edge, amazing control over chromatic aberrations, and when stopped down to f/8, the vignetting was minimal. The Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical.Ī prime lens which, according to the reviews, featured better sharpness than the 14-24mm. I already had 16mm, I wanted more ultra wideness! I wanted that 14mm that I just couldn’t afford.īut then DXOmark posted their list of Best Wide Angle Lenses for a D800, and I was reminded of a little Korean lens company that makes optically excellent products for dirt cheap.
Ptlens samyang 14mm profile upgrade#
The only thing I didn’t like about either of these two options was spending money to upgrade my image quality, but I wasn’t breaking new ground, opening up any more possibilities or wider angles, I was still going to be stuck at 16mm. Name brand glass traditionally holds it’s value a lot better than lenses made by 3rd party manufacturers, so that was another point in Nikon’s favour. Being limited to f/4 isn’t that bad when you have VR, and the weather sealing and nano-coating had me leaning towards going with the Nikon lens.
![ptlens samyang 14mm profile ptlens samyang 14mm profile](https://learn.captureone.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/Fig53-491x300.jpg)
I was set to buy that lens.īut the Nikon 16-35mm had the option to attach filters, and being able to zoom out to the relativly normal angle of 35mm made this a very versatile lens. From the reviews I read online, it is supposed to be optically as good as the Nikon 14-24, for about a third the price. I’m cheap, I don’t like to spend money, so this lens really appealed to me. Tokina has kind of taken over the ultra wide angle lens department, pumping out a lot of really excellent stuff for really great prices. I don’t want to spend $2000, so right away, that knocks the 14-24mm off the list. Nikon AF-S Zoom Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8 G IF ED Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f2.8 Pro FX for Nikon Immediately, there were 3 options on my radar: Looks like it was time to buy a new lens. The old phrase “go big or go home” came to mind. Since wide angle photography is something I enjoy, and I really want something sharp and wide. It’s just not as sharp as I would want a lens to be. And while the 11-16mm gave me beautiful images on my-6 megapixel D70, on a 24-megapixel D600, the limitations of this lens were apparent. The problem is that edge sharpness takes a nose dive, and the vignetting is terrible. Image taken with a Nikon D600 and a Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8
![ptlens samyang 14mm profile ptlens samyang 14mm profile](https://www.lenstip.com/upload3/3084_roz.jpg)
![ptlens samyang 14mm profile ptlens samyang 14mm profile](https://dancarrphotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Rokinon14mm_distortion.jpg)
Ptlens samyang 14mm profile full#
The image circle projected by the 11-16mm when it is zoomed all the way out is large enough to cover a full frame sensor. No – I’m not crazy, I really was using a DX lens on an FX body. At first, I thought I could make due with my excellent Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 DX wide angle lens. With the acquisition of my Nikon D600 several months ago, the world of ultra wide angle photography opened up to me. (Warning: Extreme levels of photo-nerd talk below)